Ironbound Forge
Ironbound Forge Expansion Notes
A seventy-year-old forge with an ASME Section III stamp and a backlog it cannot currently fill.
The bottleneck in nuclear construction is rarely the reactor. It is large-diameter forgings, and there are very few shops in the country qualified to make them. Ironbound has been forging since 1954, holds an ASME Section III certificate, and turns away work. Proceeds buy a second ring forge. Revenue is contracted across six developers, so no single reactor program determines the outcome.
$9,408,000 committed of $32,000,000
$9,408,000 released · 29% subscribed
- Minimum
- $500
- Target coupon
- 6.25%
- Term
- 6 yr
- Investors
- 1,046
$100 per unit
Annual, fixed
Closes February 28, 2027 · 168 days remaining
Sign in to see your limit
- Eligibility depends on residency, accreditation status and how much you have already invested this year.
- You can read everything about this offering without an account. Committing capital requires one.
Demo · viewing as
Browsing without an account. Everything is visible; nothing is purchasable until you verify who and where you are.
Or answer the questions yourselfNo money will move
No payment processor is connected. The commitment flow runs end to end, through amount, agreement, signature and receipt, and records a simulated position rather than a charge.
TRL assessment
9
Technology readiness level, 1 to 9
Confidence band 8.7 – 9.0
Forging is a mature process and this shop has been performing it under ASME Section III for decades, so the technology score is a formality at 9. The interesting risk is not metallurgy but execution on doubling capacity; skilled trades hiring and a second forge commissioning are the real uncertainties.
At TRL 9, the ladder permits Revenue share or Fixed-rate note or Municipal mini-bond and releases up to 100% of committed capital. This offering is structured as a fixed-rate note, which is consistent with that band.
Signed and published
- Reviewer
- Dr. Samuel Adeyemi
- Credential
- PhD Nuclear Engineering; ASME Section III reviewer
- Signed
- July 7, 2026
- Published
- July 8, 2026
- Methodology
- v1.4
- Model
- ci-trl-2026.06
- Generated
- Jul 1, 2026
Evidence
Every score cites the documents it was derived from, with the weight each carried. An assessment without evidence is an opinion.
| Source | Document | Date | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metered output | Delivered nuclear-grade forgings, trailing five years Issuer shipment records and customer acceptance Continuous production history with documented acceptance by ASME stamp holders. | Jun 30, 2026 | 40% |
| Independent test report | ASME Section III certificate and NQA-1 audit Current certificate of authorization; third-party audit Quality program audited with no major findings. | Jan 15, 2026 | 35% |
| Supplier contract | Backlog across six developers and two EPC contractors Executed purchase orders and framework agreements Backlog exceeds current annual capacity, which is the premise of the expansion. | May 22, 2026 | 25% |
Score history
A score changes on the day a reviewer signs a new assessment, which is why this is a step line rather than a curve.